> Gut-feeling microservices I'm in this comment and i don't like it. My current team has this pattern. I think we've ended up with two core services, with a f

> Gut-feeling microservices I'm in this comment and i don't like it. My current team has this pattern. I think we've ended up with two core services, with a fairly thin channel between them, but a constellation of tightly-coupled peripheral services around each core. To be honest, it works pretty well. It wasn't intentional, and it grew in exactly the haphazard way you describe. But it's not a disaster, or at least doesn't feel like one. Maybe we should rebrand this as "natural microservices"?