3 ms·
Not very well written. Confusingly structured, and doesn't actually make its core points. The first paragraph says 'to understand what makes tether tick' and th
by arbitrary_name 5y ago
Not very well written. Confusingly structured, and doesn't actually make its core points. The first paragraph says 'to understand what makes tether tick' and then kind of fails to actually explain that.
In the fifth paragraph, it tries to attack the fact that tether might be undercapitalized but then only references a source that indicates that tether is fully capitalized? Without, i dunno, referring to any actual sources that demonstrate it is undercapitalized, or illustrating why it is thought to be undercapitalized.
Later the paragraph confusingly starts with 'another impact of a tether collapse' without having pointed to the first impact?
The whole thing is written by someone who wouldn't have passed a high school English class, which is a shame as it's a topic that is really interesting and worth exploring.