4 ms·
Phew. I can't be the only person who worried there was an issue with the QT toolkit. This is something less important.
by sys_64738 5y ago
Phew. I can't be the only person who worried there was an issue with the QT toolkit. This is something less important.
- danuker 5y agoI'd argue it's more important, since the interest rate impacts future cash flow valuations, and therefore people's wealth.
- jslaby 5y agoWe can say both are equally important and divide our worry by 50%
- malkia 5y agoIt's Qt :) - lol, me too though, but seeing QT I thought it was QuickTime TBH (... not really ...)
- Geezus-42 5y agoI though Quik Trip...
- peterburkimsher 5y agoNaming things :) "There are 2 hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-1 errors." https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TwoHardThings.html https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TwoHardThings.html Some choose short variable names that they can type fast (this might be correlated with vi programmers). Others choose long variable names that are more descriptive (this might be correlated with emacs programers). Personally I chose the latter, because copy-paste is easy, and ambiguity can be confusing. But ambiguities are great fun for making puns and dadjokes. u = qtπ
- BearOso 5y agoMe, too. I expected it to be regarding the discontinuing of open source support for old QT “LTS” versions. Fits the title.
- codetrotter 5y agoI thought it was going to be something about the Year 2038 problem, but specific to the Qt toolkit.
- cperciva 5y agoMy first thought was that it was something about cardiology.
- guggle 5y agoYes... for a second I thought I would have to rewrite all the QT apps I made. This is the stuff of nightmares.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]