3 ms·
I do. And I haven't published even one post that wasn't targeted to a specific circle (non public). I think maybe the author should wait for G+ to be visible t
by yanw 15y ago
I do. And I haven't published even one post that wasn't targeted to a specific circle (non public).
I think maybe the author should wait for G+ to be visible to all users and integrated over all Google's products, have a search feature and not to mentioned easier to sign up to before he starts echoing unreliable and meaningless stats.
- Triumvark 15y ago> I do, and haven't published even one post that wasn't targeted to a specific circle. Exactly. The article is measuring the number of G+ users who don't understand circles. Declining public posts isn't necessarily a bad thing.
- hvs 15y agoI wouldn't call people who don't publish to specific circles "users who don't understand circles." I publish almost everything publicly because I honestly don't care who reads most of it. I only publish to specific circles when I actually care, which is rare.
- Triumvark 15y agoFair point, I was too hyperbolic. I just wanted to emphasize that the 'public posts' metric is not necessarily ideal for a system where "easier private publication" was a showcased feature.