As anyone with a bit of literacy can probably deduce from the domain name alone, this is misinformation. A quick scan of news mentions of the lawyer named in t

As anyone with a bit of literacy can probably deduce from the domain name alone, this is misinformation. A quick scan of news mentions of the lawyer named in the article shows they have been involved with any number of scammy attempts to push conspiracy theories through lawsuits. Before Covid, they tried to sue Hilary Clinton for murdering French children, apparently. If you are upvoting this bullshit, I'd honestly be interested why you feel the need to help spreading such lies? I get how it may sometimes be useful to misrepresent an issue you have a stake in. If you lie about the old car you are selling you still get the money. But in cases such as this, the obvious lie should be undermining your interest in making its case. It's like telling the buyer that the cash they are giving you is counterfeit, and therefore worthless. If you actually belief that to be true, why would you still be interested in it?