> If you are saying that Bitwarden is worse because it offers a free plan, I disagree. For the record, I'm not. The overall discussion was that charging for a

> If you are saying that Bitwarden is worse because it offers a free plan, I disagree. For the record, I'm not. The overall discussion was that charging for a product was somehow bad. Bitwarden does charge for their product, just at higher tier levels. My bigger point is that you do want a provider that is going to stay solvent so charging money (which Bitwarden also does) is not some perverse way of satisfying customers.