That's not a philosophy, that's rigorous observational results from a plethora of psychology studies.[0][1][2][3][4][5][6][7] (and so on) This isn't opinion, a

That's not a philosophy, that's rigorous observational results from a plethora of psychology studies.[0][1][2][3][4][5][6][7] (and so on) This isn't opinion, and these are just easily accessible sources. There are a lot more, and a lot more rigorous sources, if you're actually interested. The alignment of incentives and the perception (or lack thereof) of choice does a lot more work than you apparently are aware of. At this point, it seems like I'm trying to reason you out of an opinion you didn't reason yourself into, which is both sad and futile, so I'm going to stop. [0] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-probe-human-nature-and-discover-we-are-good-after-all/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-probe-... [1] https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_science_helps_find_good https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_science_he... [2] https://www.zmescience.com/science/humans-are-good-in-nature-science-finds-042343/ https://www.zmescience.com/science/humans-are-good-in-nature... [3] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-animals/201912/people-are-naturally-good-groups-are-not-really https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-animals/20191... [4] https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/5/23/15516752/science-human-nature-free-will-robert-sapolsky-interview https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/5/23/15516752/science... [5] https://www.nbcnews.com/better/health/good-company-why-we-need-other-people-be-happy-ncna836106 https://www.nbcnews.com/better/health/good-company-why-we-ne... [6] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/14/selfish-proof-ego-humans-inherently-good https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/14/selfis... [7] https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20130114-are-we-naturally-good-or-bad https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20130114-are-we-naturally...