3 ms·
> What am I missing? - Not all evictions were covered by the federal ban, or any applicable local bans - Most people likely did not actually go through the ev
by tehwebguy 5y ago
> What am I missing?
- Not all evictions were covered by the federal ban, or any applicable local bans
- Most people likely did not actually go through the eviction process (most people want / try to pay their bills; most would avoid a life where a landlord is constantly hounding them for unpaid rent; its greatly preferable for a tenant to avoid the mark by almost any means; can be expensive for landlords; some landlords still do illegal “self-help” evictions like lockouts or making tenancy unlivable)
- If the evictions don’t actually “soar” beyond pre-pandemic levels I’d assume it indicates the number of tenants abusing (or even rightly using) the moratoriums was lower than the stakeholders have been making it out to be
- There have been programs running simultaneously to provide rental relief across the country to make payments to landlords
- throwaway1777 5y agoAs a small scale landlord I haven’t had a single tenant abuse the moratorium. I believe another factor is rents have been on the rise, so if you do get evicted good luck finding a similar place.
- joshspankit 5y agoI would not have been mad (as in “I’m not even mad, that’s impressive” to paraphrase the quote) if someone abused the moratorium to put every month’s rent in the bank and move out with enough cash for a down payment on their own property.