> I'm not sure I agree that history is "naturally" a series of diffs. GP cites rerere as evidence it is, and I'm inclined to agree - at least when I'm merging.

> I'm not sure I agree that history is "naturally" a series of diffs. GP cites rerere as evidence it is, and I'm inclined to agree - at least when I'm merging. During a few operations like a bisect, I probably view history as snapshots. But during merges and rebases, I definitely view it as diffs; I question whether someone can even explain these operations abstractly without resorting to a diff-based explanation. And I merge/rebase 100x more than I bisect.