>The full resolution image is here... Thanks. I looked in vain for a link in the article. Gotta love it when articles discuss something but don't actually both

>The full resolution image is here... Thanks. I looked in vain for a link in the article. Gotta love it when articles discuss something but don't actually bother to link to what they're talking about. It's almost like they've forgotten what the H in HTML stands for. BTW -I'm not sure it's the full res image. A scientist quoted in the article says the original is 2GB worth. That download is a mere 24,7MB. It's still pretty hi res though.