3 ms·
That's not quite right. This ruling is not the precedent, the Schrems II ruling is the precedent. This is just a court determining that Schrems is in fact relev
by d1sxeyes 5y ago
That's not quite right. This ruling is not the precedent, the Schrems II ruling is the precedent. This is just a court determining that Schrems is in fact relevant precedent in this specific case, and finding based on that.