4 ms·
> The whole letter reads like a polemic attack on the editorial department of Scientific American. It really doesn't. The letter addresses the points raised by
by biorach 5y ago
> The whole letter reads like a polemic attack on the editorial department of Scientific American.
It really doesn't. The letter addresses the points raised by the author of the original piece.
Your comment is bizarre because it is so at odds with the actual contents of the letter.
- havelhovel 5y agoI don’t think their claim is bizarre at all. Almost every other sentence insults Scientific American or McLemore. A lesson for others wanting to get a rebuttal published: You can embarrass someone with facts, but you can’t say they "demonstrate a baffling ignorance of one of the most basic concepts."