4 ms·
> - I feel that they are linux only. They're actually better on Free/Open BSD in my experience. As stupid as it makes me sound, I often struggle to parse Linux
by Shared404 5y ago
> - I feel that they are linux only.
They're actually better on Free/Open BSD in my experience. As stupid as it makes me sound, I often struggle to parse Linux man pages, but the BSD's I've had no trouble with for a variety of topics.
> - I feel that a small amount of plain text documentation should be stored in the executable,
Isn't this how --help usually works? I would also rather have more documentation embedded, at least for some executables.
- the_only_law 5y agoFreeBSD has pretty good documentation. Comparatively, I’ve found NetBSD documentation to be lacking, although NetBSD seems to take the cake on code quality and legacy architectures (a feature I find my delve right now. On the wider discussion of doc, I’ve found Linux kernel documentation to be a pain in the ass, and sometimes ever worse than windows kernel documentation (which I won’t even both to get into)