3 ms·
There was a discussion on tenure length in another topic a month or two ago. I'm curious what you would think about someone who's stayed at one company (same r
by decafninja 5y ago
There was a discussion on tenure length in another topic a month or two ago.
I'm curious what you would think about someone who's stayed at one company (same role, same team, maybe some minor increase in responsibility and rank) for 5 years? 10 years?
Would you view someone like that better or worse than someone who has multiple n <= 2 year stints during that time?
My observation recently, having been through interview loops and having stayed at my previous company for 7 years, is that longer tenures seem to be perceived as bad these days at tech companies...possibly worse than multiple short stints. Perceptions of expert beginner syndrome, 1 year of experience * n years instead of n years of experience, laziness, lack of motivation, etc. being typical reasons given.
- lostdog 5y ago> I'm curious what you would think about someone who's stayed at one company (same role, same team, maybe some minor increase in responsibility and rank) for 5 years? 10 years? It depends. A long tenure means I will check in the interviews whether you were stagnating and just killing time, or growing and delivering on major improvements. One of the best people I worked with spent 10 years at a very minor company, but the work they spoke about in the interview was extensive, and they took on a huge amount of development work across our entire company once they joined.