3 ms·
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28967354 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28967354 178 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28873458 https://n
by potiuper 5y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28967354 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28967354 178 comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28873458 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28873458 28 comments
Prior: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/adma.202105789 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/adma.202105...
- Gatsky 5y agoHmmm... This is the same result basically. Weirdly, the OP paper doesn't cite this paper in Advanced Materials at all, although the OP paper was submitted 2 days before the Advanced Materials paper was published. Anyway, good to see it works in two different labs. EDIT: The Advanced Materials paper's process seems to produce carbon oxides, whereas the OP paper produces solid carbon. I suppose this is an important difference, the latter being more useful.