Whatever reason the DAs have to not prosecute these crimes, it's not the Special Directive 20-07 [1] called out in the letter [2]. UP is very clear that there

Whatever reason the DAs have to not prosecute these crimes, it's not the Special Directive 20-07 [1] called out in the letter [2]. UP is very clear that there is "armed robbery" which would count as a felony while the Special Directive 20-07 only deals with lowering "misdemeanor convictions". [1]: https://da.lacounty.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/SPECIAL-DIRECTIVE-20-07.pdf https://da.lacounty.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/SPECIAL-DIRE... [2] > UP and our goods movement partners strongly urge you to reconsider the policies detailed in Special Directive 20-07