I wrote: > Game prices on the switch is why I haven't gave in to the temptation yet. Not: > Game prices on the switch is why it's not worth gave in to the te

I wrote: > Game prices on the switch is why I haven't gave in to the temptation yet. Not: > Game prices on the switch is why it's not worth gave in to the temptation yet. > I guess the difference I'm trying to make is between "it personally isn't worth that to me", which is of course entirely valid, and a more objective-sounding statement of "games cost too much", which I think any objective analysis would say is ridiculous. No, you built a straw man argument. Do I go around asking for a refund because The Witness has been given for free and I paid for it in full upon release ? That would be entitlement. Not buying a switch because switch games are too expensive for me is not being entitled. I also think not buying a switch because I may think switch games are too expensive is not being entitled. > [..] , which I think any objective analysis would say is ridiculous. Yeah, way to go. First you suggest in a reply to me that people who think like you think I do are entitled and then you state your opinion is objective and then throw a blanket statement about something no one said and suggest this position is objectively ridiculous. Fitting username.