3 ms·
Unfortunately, I think that holding the driver responsible is more legally feasible route to take. If you are successful with that, consumer confidence in these
by dml2135 5y ago
Unfortunately, I think that holding the driver responsible is more legally feasible route to take. If you are successful with that, consumer confidence in these features will drop to 0 and the companies will be forced to put up or shut up with their advertising claims.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- aiisjustanif 5y agoThat’s ridiculous. Ruin multiple lives for a product that failed. But now that I say that. Was it Auto-pilot which legal is cruise control? Or was it Full-Self Driving and the car made a decision? Legally it’s a matter of man vs machine of it is FSD. Is man wrong if there was even the slightest attempt to correct the machine’s decision after the fact? If it is in fact legal to allow said machine to act while supervised. It could also be a matter of arguing current training and regulation for FSD, is regulation of drivers sufficient for what now is a new mode of private transportation? Should autonomous vehicles be allowed to be owned yet, do they really fit under the same umbrella as normal license? Or should they be special like a CDL or MJ licenses?