7 ms·

Purely anecdotal but I feel like we are at a point where a lot of people would definitely stop and take a close look at a non-Android alternative to the iPhone

by sylens 5y ago

kyriakos 5y ago
Would be really hard to launch a new platform. Even if its excellent on its own unfortunately it can't survive without a big app catalog.
- sylens 5y ago
  Yes, it would definitely be an uphill battle. But I wonder if you could build a platform where a progressive web app felt enough like a mobile app and therefore enticed more app developers than requiring them to learn native tools for another platform
  - leppr 5y ago
    Ever heard of Firefox OS? https://medium.com/@bfrancis/the-legacy-of-firefox-os-c58ec32d94f0 https://medium.com/@bfrancis/the-legacy-of-firefox-os-c58ec3...
  - frivoal 5y ago
    Can a new phone platform be successful if it launches without whatsapp / wechat / line / instagram / [add a dozen social networks there]? A phone that doesn't let you speak to your friends, family, and coworkers is going to be a tough sell. Getting all those from the get go, without a large user base to motivate the developers, is going to be a tough sell.
- friedman23 5y ago
  Easy solution, make the default app platform be based off of html/css/javascript. Now the entire ecosystem of web developers can build for your platform instantly.
  - rstupek 5y ago
    Wasn't that PalmOS which got acquired by LG?
    - vanadium 5y ago
      That would be Palm webOS.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
  - vanadium 5y ago
    The nostalgia I have for 2009-2011's webOS, as a former app dev for the platform and its embrace of the Web Platform, is still very much real to the point that I keep my Palm Pre 2 dev unit behind me in my home office. Still charges and boots just like it did back in 2010. I'd love to see something with the computing power of the present try it again (and I'm aware React Native exists), but my expectations of it ever coming to fruition are rather low. Aside: Seeing MagSafe chargers for iPhones these days makes me chuckle. Also a webOS innovation from back in...2009.
    - skinnymuch 5y ago
      I lost my old Pre recently. Will probably buy another for the nostalgia reasons as well.
  - skinnymuch 5y ago
    My beloved webOS failed with that 11, 12 years ago.
- Keyframe 5y ago
  They can always start from their old playbook with Embrace..
bhauer 5y ago
I would be very happy with a third option. As an iPhone user, I really am unhappy with iOS, but any time I even briefly entertain the idea of switching to Android, I laugh at the idea. Both options are bad, and I'm stuck with the lesser of two evils.
- bee_rider 5y ago
  The new PinePhone actually looks kinda decent. Unfortunately it will likely go from an interesting idea to abandoned before my iPhone is ready for a replacement.
  - mastazi 5y ago
    I have the PinePhone Beta Edition with Convergence Package and I tried all of the available OS alternatives, unfortunately none of those is quite ready for use as a daily driver. Overall the best experience was with Mobian, this is actually pretty close to being a daily driver and if only performance was a bit better it could be OK (the new PinePhone Pro will be faster so I'm waiting to try Mobian with that). Ubuntu Touch was the smoothest in terms of performance. The main disadvantage is I could not find some of the apps that are available for the other distros like Gnome Maps. Since it is based on Ubuntu I was expecting to find a larger app ecosystem compared to Mobian but that wasn't the case (I tried searching both in the store app and using apt search in terminal). Also, many apps in the store are actually repackaged progressive apps. The default OS (Manjaro Plasma) is the least polished of all the ones I tried, it is quite a lot slower than Mobian or Ubuntu Touch and even basic things like placing an app on the home screen are broken, and I have no idea why they chose it as the default OS.
- tootahe45 5y ago
  Why is android bad in your opinion? i personally went for IOS recently due to privacy,security being important to me(3 years of security update for 1.4k android device is ridiculous), but I'm pretty jealous of android's software, usability and its users not having to buy everything apple to do simple tasks. I don't feel like MS would do better on security or privacy compared to android.
FalconSensei 5y ago
> "a lot of people" Depends what you mean by a lot of people, and what kind of alternative you have in mind. Tech folks want something open source, like the degoogle androids we already see. Non-tech folks don't care much about Android, they just want something that works and has all the apps. So it would be hard to have any real competition, considering even Microsoft had to pull the plug

Purely anecdotal but I feel like we are at a point where a lot of people would definitely stop and take a close look at a non-Android alternative to the iPhone

by sylens 5y ago

Purely anecdotal but I feel like we are at a point where a lot of people would definitely stop and take a close look at a non-Android alternative to the iPhone

kyriakos 5y ago

Would be really hard to launch a new platform. Even if its excellent on its own unfortunately it can't survive without a big app catalog.

sylens 5y ago
Yes, it would definitely be an uphill battle. But I wonder if you could build a platform where a progressive web app felt enough like a mobile app and therefore enticed more app developers than requiring them to learn native tools for another platform
- leppr 5y ago
  Ever heard of Firefox OS? https://medium.com/@bfrancis/the-legacy-of-firefox-os-c58ec32d94f0 https://medium.com/@bfrancis/the-legacy-of-firefox-os-c58ec3...
- frivoal 5y ago
  Can a new phone platform be successful if it launches without whatsapp / wechat / line / instagram / [add a dozen social networks there]? A phone that doesn't let you speak to your friends, family, and coworkers is going to be a tough sell. Getting all those from the get go, without a large user base to motivate the developers, is going to be a tough sell.
friedman23 5y ago
Easy solution, make the default app platform be based off of html/css/javascript. Now the entire ecosystem of web developers can build for your platform instantly.
- rstupek 5y ago
  Wasn't that PalmOS which got acquired by LG?
  - vanadium 5y ago
    That would be Palm webOS.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- vanadium 5y ago
  The nostalgia I have for 2009-2011's webOS, as a former app dev for the platform and its embrace of the Web Platform, is still very much real to the point that I keep my Palm Pre 2 dev unit behind me in my home office. Still charges and boots just like it did back in 2010. I'd love to see something with the computing power of the present try it again (and I'm aware React Native exists), but my expectations of it ever coming to fruition are rather low. Aside: Seeing MagSafe chargers for iPhones these days makes me chuckle. Also a webOS innovation from back in...2009.
  - skinnymuch 5y ago
    I lost my old Pre recently. Will probably buy another for the nostalgia reasons as well.
- skinnymuch 5y ago
  My beloved webOS failed with that 11, 12 years ago.
Keyframe 5y ago
They can always start from their old playbook with Embrace..

bhauer 5y ago

I would be very happy with a third option. As an iPhone user, I really am unhappy with iOS, but any time I even briefly entertain the idea of switching to Android, I laugh at the idea. Both options are bad, and I'm stuck with the lesser of two evils.

bee_rider 5y ago
The new PinePhone actually looks kinda decent. Unfortunately it will likely go from an interesting idea to abandoned before my iPhone is ready for a replacement.
- mastazi 5y ago
  I have the PinePhone Beta Edition with Convergence Package and I tried all of the available OS alternatives, unfortunately none of those is quite ready for use as a daily driver. Overall the best experience was with Mobian, this is actually pretty close to being a daily driver and if only performance was a bit better it could be OK (the new PinePhone Pro will be faster so I'm waiting to try Mobian with that). Ubuntu Touch was the smoothest in terms of performance. The main disadvantage is I could not find some of the apps that are available for the other distros like Gnome Maps. Since it is based on Ubuntu I was expecting to find a larger app ecosystem compared to Mobian but that wasn't the case (I tried searching both in the store app and using apt search in terminal). Also, many apps in the store are actually repackaged progressive apps. The default OS (Manjaro Plasma) is the least polished of all the ones I tried, it is quite a lot slower than Mobian or Ubuntu Touch and even basic things like placing an app on the home screen are broken, and I have no idea why they chose it as the default OS.
tootahe45 5y ago
Why is android bad in your opinion? i personally went for IOS recently due to privacy,security being important to me(3 years of security update for 1.4k android device is ridiculous), but I'm pretty jealous of android's software, usability and its users not having to buy everything apple to do simple tasks. I don't feel like MS would do better on security or privacy compared to android.

FalconSensei 5y ago

> "a lot of people" Depends what you mean by a lot of people, and what kind of alternative you have in mind. Tech folks want something open source, like the degoogle androids we already see. Non-tech folks don't care much about Android, they just want something that works and has all the apps. So it would be hard to have any real competition, considering even Microsoft had to pull the plug