> It's that artists get a different source of income (which may require stopping being an artist). What a peculiar thought: Is an artist still an artist if th

> It's that artists get a different source of income (which may require stopping being an artist). What a peculiar thought: Is an artist still an artist if they stop being an artist? > Come on, the alternative to taxpayers subsidising artists isn't that artists face a choice between death or revolt. No of course not, yet artists committing suicide for being unable to create their art isn't exactly unheard of. And what I said is exactly true if you maybe think about things a little differently.