4 ms·
I'm suspicious that reliability issues stemming from an extreme power draw and level of heat generated when you run AVX-512 instructions was the reason for thos
by GeekyBear 5y ago
I'm suspicious that reliability issues stemming from an extreme power draw and level of heat generated when you run AVX-512 instructions was the reason for those instructions being disabled recently.
>One of the big takeaways from our initial Core i7-11700K review was the power consumption under AVX-512 modes, as well as the high temperatures. Even with the latest microcode updates, both of our Core i9 parts draw lots of power.
The Core i9-11900K in our test peaks up to 296 W, showing temperatures of 104ºC, before coming back down to ~230 W and dropping to 4.5 GHz. The Core i7-11700K is still showing 278 W in our ASUS board, tempeartures of 103ºC, and after the initial spike we see 4.4 GHz at the same ~230 W.
There are a number of ways to report CPU temperature. We can either take the instantaneous value of a singular spot of the silicon while it’s currently going through a high-current density event, like compute, or we can consider the CPU as a whole with all of its thermal sensors. While the overall CPU might accept operating temperatures of 105ºC, individual elements of the core might actually reach 125ºC instantaneously. So what is the correct value, and what is safe?
https://www.anandtech.com/show/16495/intel-rocket-lake-14nm-review-11900k-11700k-11600k/5 https://www.anandtech.com/show/16495/intel-rocket-lake-14nm-...
- celrod 5y agoIn that particular benchmark (3d particle movement), the 11700K performed about 4x better than the AMD 5900X. Performance/watt clearly wasn't suffering. Perhaps it could downlock more to address the wattage while still coming well ahead in terms of performance, although some older CPUs doing this gave AVX512 a bad reputation. Few workloads are as well optimized to take advantage of AVX512 as the 3d particle movement benchmark, so both the increases in performance and wattage seen in that benchmark are atypical. If they were typical, then AVX512 would be much more popular. FWIW, I'm a big fan of wide CPU vector instructions. The real reason it was disabled is probably to push people like me to buy Saphire Rapids, which I would've favored anyway for the extra FMA unit. Although I'll also be waiting to see if Zen4 brings AVX512, which some rumors have claimed (and others have contradicted).
- GeekyBear 5y agoOne of the failure modes for chips as they move to smaller process nodes is electromigration. >Electromigration is the movement of atoms based on the flow of current through a material. If the current density is high enough, the heat dissipated within the material will repeatedly break atoms from the structure and move them. This will create both ‘vacancies’ and ‘deposits’. The vacancies can grow and eventually break circuit connections resulting in open-circuits, while the deposits can grow and eventually close circuit connections resulting in short-circuit. Chips that get very hot are expected to be the first to show this sort of failure. >In Black’s equation, which is used to compute the mean time to failure of metal lines, the temperature of the conductor appears in the exponent https://www.synopsys.com/glossary/what-is-electromigration.html https://www.synopsys.com/glossary/what-is-electromigration.h...