3 ms·
The fun thing is, they have corrected a bunch of that in newer versions of postgresql. I'm surprised that the problem stemmed from an index where the 'AND NOT
by briffle 5y ago
The fun thing is, they have corrected a bunch of that in newer versions of postgresql.
I'm surprised that the problem stemmed from an index where the 'AND NOT NULL' took forevery to scan, and they didn't include a partial index, or an index in a different order since they are sorted.