> Unless some entity is able to introduce measurable biases that deviates from predictable probabilistic distribution This is always the problem with argument

> Unless some entity is able to introduce measurable biases that deviates from predictable probabilistic distribution This is always the problem with arguments for free will or at least the idea that one "could have done something different" that try to use physics/science. It requires metaphysical action, literally something that cannot be understood with physics. The whole purpose of physics is to define the universe as deterministic. Quantum randomness is exactly that, random. If it was influenceable in some way, it wouldn't be random. Furthermore, the decision to influence it would still be deterministic so the metaphysics doesn't even make sense. Quantum magic is just the bleeding edge of woo.