2 ms·
I actually thought it was really bad propaganda, and quite transparent. The arguments are incoherent, and they don't have any proposal. They say "we aren't aga
by denton-scratch 5y ago
I actually thought it was really bad propaganda, and quite transparent. The arguments are incoherent, and they don't have any proposal.
They say "we aren't against e2e, we just want big tech to deploy it in a way that is safe". Well, either you have e2e or you don't; it's not surprising they have no proposal.
- dogleash 5y ago>I actually thought it was really bad propaganda, and quite transparent. The arguments are incoherent, and they don't have any proposal. There's a saying that you only notice propaganda that doesn't work on you. That's not quite true, but roughly speaking, that's why you think this is so dumb. I could list off around a dozen other incoherent positions with no underlying policy proposals, if it wasn't for the fact they're actually quite popular right now and I know well enough to bite my tongue.
- deadbunny 5y ago99% of the population don't understand that distinction. Which is exactly why they're running this campaign. It'll connect e2ee with criminals in the populations minds.