This is a good point. Actually on closer inspection they don't even particularly care about E2E encryption, and here I was thinking this was snooper's charter

This is a good point. Actually on closer inspection they don't even particularly care about E2E encryption, and here I was thinking this was snooper's charter v2: > We are not opposed to end-to-encryption in principle and fully support the importance of strong user privacy. Instead, our campaign is calling for social media companies to work with us to find a solution that protects privacy, without putting children at even greater risk. So we missed the point. This is a campaign to protect kids from shitty parenting, aa, I mean the social networks... so that they can be safely indoctrinated by social media without needing to encourage a responsible society. In all seriousness, the larger risk here then is not necessarily criminal activity from data leaks (though that's still a real possibility with a gov backdoor) - the greater risk is deeper government mass surveillance built directly into the most popular social media networks.