4 ms·
It does seem like an overreaction to me but there is a big difference in cell towers and satellite uplinks/downlinks Radio towers (sites) have widely varying q
by kloch 5y ago
It does seem like an overreaction to me but there is a big difference in cell towers and satellite uplinks/downlinks
Radio towers (sites) have widely varying quality control of their tenant's installations. Other transmitters can mix and amplify signals from other carriers without well designed and maintained RF filtering on each and every antenna. The more transmitters at a site the more carrier frequencies that can contribute to the mixing, and the more opportunities for poor or broken RF filters. At some busy sites there is almost nothing you can do to prevent this. Anything on the tower that acts like a diode can cause mixing, even without being amplified by another transmitter.
This usually just harms other receivers at the site however. But an airplane flying close by could theoretically be affected depending on how close it is.
- NovemberWhiskey 5y ago>It does seem like an overreaction to me but there is a big difference in cell towers and satellite uplinks/downlinks N.B. as far as I know, the portion of the C-band that's in question was allocated for satellite downlinks; uplinks were over 6GHz. With that in mind, there is indeed a Big Difference between a satellite in orbit radiating downwards, and a 5G beam forming installation on the ground potentially radiating upwards.