4 ms·
There are no winners in this. First the pro-vax say that antivaxxers do not process facts. Now it seems those pro-vax refuse to gain evidence prior to social ju
by robthebrew 5y ago
There are no winners in this. First the pro-vax say that antivaxxers do not process facts. Now it seems those pro-vax refuse to gain evidence prior to social judgement. May be this is relevant to the discussion? https://phys.org/news/2022-01-rationality-declined-decades.html https://phys.org/news/2022-01-rationality-declined-decades.h...
- smt88 5y ago> Now it seems those pro-vax refuse to gain evidence prior to social judgement. What do you mean by this? What should "pro-vax" (i.e. the vast majority of developed countries) be doing differently?
- Arnt 5y agoWe should be kind, gentle and not "question […] medical choices". IMO when someone has died is an excellent time to hold one's tongue and offer condolance. Even if the deceased person was one of those whose "medical choices" isn't just their own choice, it has real impact on us all by blocking access to hospitals. There are many good times to flame them, just after someone's died is not such a time.
- smt88 5y ago1. Weird that you responded for another person. I'm not sure if they would agree with you or not. 2. I don't know why you think there is widespread "flaming" of unvaccinated people among vaccinated people. There are niche communities of assholes on reddit and Twitter who do it, and they don't represent even a tiny fraction of pro-science, pro-vaccine people.