3 ms·

Who won't ever get a serious chance to debate...the structure is set up to permit Coke vs. Pepsi... not Coke v. Pepsi v. RC Cola

datameta 5y ago
I'd have agreed with you if Bernie hadn't been able to effectively voice his views during the Democratic Preaidential Debates in the 2020 election. And prior, in 2016, he was able to shift the collective viewpoint of the Democrats. I think he has had a tremendous impact, even if he wasn't able to go all the way.
tharne 5y ago
Bernie Sanders won't get a serious chance to debate because his platform appeals to a small minority of Americans and most folks don't want he's selling. Democrats make up less than half of votes and progressives are a minority of Democrats. To borrow an analogy from Jerry Garcia, Bernie Sanders is the black licorice of American politicians. Most people don't like him, but the people who like him really like him.
- AlexandrB 5y ago
  Something like 70% of Americans support some form of "medicare for all"[1]. And as another poster mentioned Bernie was to the right of many democrats on the second amendment. I'm not sure which unpopular issues you're referring to. > Democrats make up less than half of votes Not the popular vote. Even Hillary managed to win the popular vote in 2016. [1] https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/494602-poll-69-percent-of-voters-support-medicare-for-all https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/494602-pol...
  - tharne 5y ago
    >> Democrats make up less than half of votes I was referring to registered democrats, as I believe was the article. Regarding Medicare for all, those numbers are misleading. It has 70% of support until you get into the actual details of implementation. It's the same when folks say "An overwhelming majority of Americans support higher taxes on the rich". Well yes, but those surveys tend to leave out the definition of rich, so people tend to interpret it as "Rich = Someone who makes more money than I do". This is not to advocate against medicare for all, but rather to say that it's easy to garner support for something in the abstract without getting into all the messy details that reality likes to impose.

datameta 5y ago

I'd have agreed with you if Bernie hadn't been able to effectively voice his views during the Democratic Preaidential Debates in the 2020 election. And prior, in 2016, he was able to shift the collective viewpoint of the Democrats. I think he has had a tremendous impact, even if he wasn't able to go all the way.

tharne 5y ago

Bernie Sanders won't get a serious chance to debate because his platform appeals to a small minority of Americans and most folks don't want he's selling. Democrats make up less than half of votes and progressives are a minority of Democrats. To borrow an analogy from Jerry Garcia, Bernie Sanders is the black licorice of American politicians. Most people don't like him, but the people who like him really like him.

AlexandrB 5y ago
Something like 70% of Americans support some form of "medicare for all"[1]. And as another poster mentioned Bernie was to the right of many democrats on the second amendment. I'm not sure which unpopular issues you're referring to. > Democrats make up less than half of votes Not the popular vote. Even Hillary managed to win the popular vote in 2016. [1] https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/494602-poll-69-percent-of-voters-support-medicare-for-all https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/494602-pol...
- tharne 5y ago
  >> Democrats make up less than half of votes I was referring to registered democrats, as I believe was the article. Regarding Medicare for all, those numbers are misleading. It has 70% of support until you get into the actual details of implementation. It's the same when folks say "An overwhelming majority of Americans support higher taxes on the rich". Well yes, but those surveys tend to leave out the definition of rich, so people tend to interpret it as "Rich = Someone who makes more money than I do". This is not to advocate against medicare for all, but rather to say that it's easy to garner support for something in the abstract without getting into all the messy details that reality likes to impose.