4 ms·
There certainly are, the problem is the burden of proof. One case in particular was the USS Nimitz UAP video. It first leaked on the conspiracy Above Top Secret
by bigodbiel 5y ago
There certainly are, the problem is the burden of proof. One case in particular was the USS Nimitz UAP video. It first leaked on the conspiracy Above Top Secret forum in 2009 (iirc); the now disclosed video, comms transcript,m. Obviously no one believed (and this being a conspiracy forum!), not that OP behavior helped with credibility. But still interesting to have such vindicated after all these years.
- dmead 5y agoThat's got very little to do with what I'm talking about The incident I'm talking about was activity duty army officers being paid by the pentagon to do propoganda work in the early social media years. They would post pictures and video (in broad daylight) of the latest weapons or jets and something with tag lines like "these guys are doing a great job!". The user was later outed as coming from the pentagon or some base in the northeast. I don't know what the ufo videos have to do with what I'm talking about. The implication here is that the times article is also just a work of propaganda that tries to justify the absurd amounts of money being pumped into defense.