> If the blockchain were the authority on IP addresses But it's not -- the root servers are -- by premise here. Premise is we assume zero config results in I

> If the blockchain were the authority on IP addresses But it's not -- the root servers are -- by premise here. Premise is we assume zero config results in ICANN root servers having authority. My point is that given this premise, blockchain is ineffective. You are introducing ICANN as informational MITM and censor node in between user and blockchain validation. True, you are excluding USA, if your only goal is exclude USA then this accomplishes that goal, but if your goal is censorship-proof then this is not it.