3 ms·

>If no, why would you even comment on the legal system of a country you don't know at all? I commented on the article you linked. I don't know about French law

>If no, why would you even comment on the legal system of a country you don't know at all? I commented on the article you linked. I don't know about French law, but I do know your source didn't back up your claim. I find it hard to believe a URL can be trademarked, things like search engines just couldn't function that way. And why would you comment about the DMCA, a part of a legal system you seemingly don't know at all?

littlestymaar 5y ago
> And why would you comment about the DMCA, a part of a legal system you seemingly don't know at all? You realized that I asked a question about it right? > I commented on the article you linked. I don't know about French law, but I do know your source didn't back up your claim. The source was about the (only tangentially related) issue of product reviews, since I was talking about it in a side note parenthesis. Not about the main topic. > I find it hard to believe a URL can be trademarked It's not an URL, it's a domain name. (a URL is a string “<protocol>://<domain/[<http route>]”) and domain names are clearly subject to trademarks in France[1]. But it's seems to be different in the US[2]. [1]: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milka_contre_Kraft_Foods https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milka_contre_Kraft_Foods [2]: otherwise Facebook wouldn't have needed to pay $200,000 for its domain name I guess?