The article talks about trust but doesn't even mention the insane amount of trust blockchain solutions are expecting you to put on the cryptography that it util

The article talks about trust but doesn't even mention the insane amount of trust blockchain solutions are expecting you to put on the cryptography that it utilizes. This idea that crypto is some impenetrable fortress is ridiculous. At best it's a well fortified castle that should provide a reasonable assurance that it will keep attackers at bay for long enough that you feel secure. They expect to put all the worlds money on there, insurance contracts, land records and when there's a weakness found in the crypto it all just goes poof? This would exceed Tyler Durden's wildest dreams.