3 ms·
This can't be permanent. I bet this is to keep the markets happy in the short term while this gets absorbed, and then Kotick will "retire" at some point in the
by sbarre 5y ago
This can't be permanent. I bet this is to keep the markets happy in the short term while this gets absorbed, and then Kotick will "retire" at some point in the next year.
- joaodlf 5y agoI'd buy shares right now if they had gotten rid of Kotick.
- techdragon 5y agoEven though it would cost an additional $275 ish million?