I didn't mean to hijack the thread, I was just replying to somebody saying something about Cash :) I'm ambivalent regarding your documentation point, on one en

I didn't mean to hijack the thread, I was just replying to somebody saying something about Cash :) I'm ambivalent regarding your documentation point, on one end jQuery is way more popular and one can largely just read jQuery's documentation for the methods that Cash implements too. On the other end that doesn't quite work when Cash's implementation works a bit differently than jQuery's, and just having a consistent, good, documentation is better in that case, and probably in general too. I don't personally care much which libraries people use for their needs, personally I'm trying to incrementally move away to Cash and other jQuery-like direct DOM manipulation libraries entirely, but it takes time.