3 ms·
I kind of agree with you, but just because it creates a precedent. If Blizzard allows a political statement, then now they have to allow other political stateme
by scoutt 5y ago
I kind of agree with you, but just because it creates a precedent. If Blizzard allows a political statement, then now they have to allow other political statements too. As a result, they will have to "regulate" which political statements is allowed or denied, which will force them in a position of having to judge about what is wrong and what is right. And what corporation wants to do that?
Not all political statements are "black" or "white", "right" or "wrong" (Manichaeism style), and there are a lot of gray areas sometimes, and everybody has something to complain about on Twitter. And if Blizzard decides "wrong" then they may suffer and repair the backslash.
So the reaction from Blizzard is like the sign you used to see in a lot of bars: "No politics, no religion".
Understand I'm not saying that the player is wrong about what he said, or justifying what happens in HK.