4 ms·
I agree with both your points. To be honest if the same signal is sent by merely confirming employment dates but not literally disparaging the former employee,
by thakoppno 5y ago
I agree with both your points. To be honest if the same signal is sent by merely confirming employment dates but not literally disparaging the former employee, I fail to see how there’s any additional legal protection. The implication is tortious interferus in both cases.
- eru 5y agoThat's why many companies don't give any details at all, whether positive or negative. This way your line of argument doesn't apply; not from a logical point of view and also not from a legal point of view: no signal is sent at all.
- thakoppno 5y agoI agree with you too. For the sake of my argument, I was conjuring the scenario where companies give either positive recommendations or bare minimum ones.