5 ms·
You know, they were funded because of these novelty. If you spend more time with international charity activity, you'll see that no one truly want to help the p
by justicezyx 5y ago
You know, they were funded because of these novelty. If you spend more time with international charity activity, you'll see that no one truly want to help the poor, they are more interested in showing their kindness.
- KerrAvon 5y agoI think it’s a bit more complicated than that — wasn’t Negroponte involved with it?
- bmitc 5y agoAnd? https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/09/05/133159/mit-media-lab-jeffrey-epstein-joi-ito-nicholas-negroponte-funding-sex-abuse/ https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/09/05/133159/mit-media...
- lmm 5y agoI don't think it's quite that. I think it's that the prospect of making reducing poverty your life's work and the end result is that you reduce the world poverty rate by 0.02% is just too oppressive to face head-on. So you either get people who devote themselves to the process rather than the outcome, or you get outcome-oriented people who look for shortcuts and miracle fixes. But that doesn't mean the motive is insincere.