It's OK to point out neglected historic facts (i.e. she translated a piece), but churning out claims about the logical male mind while misrepresenting modern fe

It's OK to point out neglected historic facts (i.e. she translated a piece), but churning out claims about the logical male mind while misrepresenting modern feminisms as a monolithic man-hating ideology sounds kind of like ... the "baying call of the loser"