I'd find the key claim here to be more persuasive if it wasn’t embedded in a two page misogynistic screed. If anyone would like to post a less emotional argume

I'd find the key claim here to be more persuasive if it wasn’t embedded in a two page misogynistic screed. If anyone would like to post a less emotional argument that attempts to make the case that Lovelace's contributions to the history of computing are overblown, I'd love to read it. But written in this way it’s hard to take at face value.