>I am confident that somewhere between 10% and 50% of papers published in good journals are wrong, meaningless or fraudulent. This is entirely unsurprising to

>I am confident that somewhere between 10% and 50% of papers published in good journals are wrong, meaningless or fraudulent. This is entirely unsurprising to me. On top of this, reporters will see something interesting in a big name journal and report on it yet that usually adds a whole 'nother layer of incorrectness that the general public picks up as "fact"