Is it April 1 already? "Whereas gcc’s cleanup attribute is attached to functions, POSIX’ cleanup functions and the try/finally are attached to possibly nested

Is it April 1 already? "Whereas gcc’s cleanup attribute is attached to functions, POSIX’ cleanup functions and the try/finally are attached to possibly nested blocks. This indicates that existing mechanism in compilers may have difficulties with a block model. So we only require it to be implemented for function bodies and make it implementation-defined if it is also offered for internal blocks. Nevertheless, we think that it is important that the semantics for the feature are clearly specified for the case of blocks, such that all implementations that do offer such a feature follow the same semantics. Therefore it is also a constraint violation to ask for the feature for blocks on implementations that don’t have support for it." To call this incompetent would be too kind. Completely wrong about the scope of gcc's cleanup attribute, wrong to omit the prior art from Dlang, utterly wrong about what it "indicates", wrong about making it implementation-defined ... and that's just this one section.