Not necessarily. Leaving out that word is highly unfair to the authors. It turns a defensible but also boring claim into one that draws attention, but is as go

Not necessarily. Leaving out that word is highly unfair to the authors. It turns a defensible but also boring claim into one that draws attention, but is as good as impossible to defend. I think that, looking at pensioners, UBI will lead to people working less. Many of those who can afford to happily are unemployed.