>The play store review program is there to serve the installing users, not the app authors, so even a high rate of obvious false positives is probably considere

>The play store review program is there to serve the installing users, not the app authors, so even a high rate of obvious false positives is probably considered acceptable. This article should provove that Google incompetence exists and it works in both ways, it blocks good apps and there is no reason why bad apps would get away. I mean code like if(shity title translation constains an word from illegalWordsInEnglishList) proves there is no super clever AI here but at best a quick workaround , so if quick workaround or shity code is allowed why would you be convinced that the "security" scans are better? (we found that 100% Apple security scans are as bad so I won't be surprised if a Google dev also created a list of illegalAPUIs and does a naive search that clever developers can get around with a bit of clever reflection/dynaimc class or obfuscation) TL:DR I am not convinced that badly implemented policies and shiutty implemented security scans do not affect the users.