4 ms·

Some sites have a positive result [1][2][3][4][5][6]. What does that mean for them? [1] - https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.twitter.com https://illegal

Some sites have a positive result [1][2][3][4][5][6]. What does that mean for them? [1] - https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.twitter.com https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.twitter.com [2] - https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.discord.com https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.discord.com [3] - https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.slack.com https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.slack.com [4] - https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.youtube.com https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.youtube.com [5] - https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.cnn.com https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.cnn.com [6] - https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.foxnews.com https://illegal.analyticsscanner.com/www.foxnews.com

JackWritesCode 5y ago
That if they're processing EU website visitor traffic, they're in violation of the Schrems II ruling, and violating the GDPR. Very messy situation right now.
- LinuxBender 5y ago
  Do they have a grace period in which to become compliant?
  - JackWritesCode 5y ago
    The Schrems II ruling occurred back in 2020. Max Schrems & noyb have filed 101 complaints, and we're now going to see DPAs make decisions (meaning the ruling is enforced). What's new now is that a DPA has actually made a decision against Google Analytics (and US cloud providers). I can only speculate on what's going to happen.