3 ms·
The general concept is correct but there are a few issues with the article: - Specific RGB values always depend on a selected white balance temperature. If th
by kloch 5y ago
The general concept is correct but there are a few issues with the article:
- Specific RGB values always depend on a selected white balance temperature. If the WB temp is the same as the object's temp it would be white, not blue. If the WB temp were higher than the object's temp it would appear red.
EDIT: the article does say sRGB which implies a 6500K wb.
- "infinitely hot" is not physically possible. The Neutron star example is fine, that temp would be around 10^12 K
At that temperature virtually all of the emission would be in gamma rays, but emission in the visible spectrum would not be zero. Blue wavelengths would be stronger than green, which would be stronger than red so the color would appear Blue for any "normal" white balance temp (like 5500 K).
- rini17 5y agoIt explicitly says sRGB which has commonly agreed white spot of 6500K. And thus it's reasonable assumption that photo of neutron star displayed on common monitor would have such color. Infinity is a well understood mathematical construct. I don't know what is the issue with evaluating limit value of some function, in this case color, "at infinity"? Nowhere it says it's physically possible.