3 ms·
I understood that, but my comment could have been more clear. I more meant that it's not necessarily obvious that the type check should infer that it's a `usize
by messe 5y ago
I understood that, but my comment could have been more clear. I more meant that it's not necessarily obvious that the type check should infer that it's a `usize` just because the function returns a `usize`. It could be any type that can be implicitly cast to a `usize` which in a 64-bit Zig system is any of `u[1-64]`.