3 ms·
> What he did was no where near acceptable. It was a rebellious act against (what seems like) overbearing organizations, comparable to spraying a graffiti on t
by Sebb767 5y ago
> What he did was no where near acceptable.
It was a rebellious act against (what seems like) overbearing organizations, comparable to spraying a graffiti on their walls. As I said, there was no serious damage and nobody was hurt; it's not like he burned down buildings or shot at people. I'm of the opinion that this was not the right way as well, but in the end it really wasn't that bad.
- chaostheory 5y agoChanging the license would be just as “rebellious” and it wouldn’t have hurt anyone. It also would have drastically increased his chances of getting paid. Given his bomb making activities, I feel that this was more of an excuse to watch the world burn.