6 ms·

But you do get to criticize poor judgement and provide reasonable alternative courses of action.

• cxr 5y ago
  Nice bait-and-switch, but we can scroll back and see how relevant your defense of the comment I responded to really is. Declamations are fine; declarations about what is "acceptable" and what "they should have done" are more than mere criticism of poor judgement, etc., and are what the author of the comment I responded to actually wrote.
  • balls187 5y ago
    > Instead of adding an infinite loop to purposely sabotage other projects, he should have either walked away or changed the license for future versions of faker into a much more restricted one Then from the context, you can clearly read the comment you responded to did not mention that Makar needed to do anything for him specifically.
    • cxr 5y ago
      > he should have either [done this thing (that I deem would be "acceptable") or this other thing] (This is my last response to you, since you were strawmanning from the beginning and this is obviously not going to go anywhere that doesn't involve intellectual dishonesty dressed up as a clever retort.)
      • balls187 5y ago
        Or ad hominem attacks.