> but we're not talking about the legal aspect Yes we are. I was responding to someone[1] who was alluding to the legal aspect using legal terms s/he clearly d

> but we're not talking about the legal aspect Yes we are. I was responding to someone[1] who was alluding to the legal aspect using legal terms s/he clearly doesn't understand. > > "What GitHub policy did he violate? The really outrageous thing is that the developer going "rogue" was actually him expressing his freedom of speech..." 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29961662 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29961662