4 ms·
economy of scale. Cheaper by volume and priced on utilization. There was a time when HP sold servers that could be up to say, 8 cores but only two were on by d
by supernovae 5y ago
economy of scale. Cheaper by volume and priced on utilization.
There was a time when HP sold servers that could be up to say, 8 cores but only two were on by default and you cloud license the rest. It was cheaper to shop the hardware and software gate it rather than limit it and have a process in the middle.
- ndiddy 5y agoWhy does Intel, a company known for its extensive price discrimination (see ECC memory support, hardware virtualization, FPU support in the 90s) still put ME in all of its consumer CPUs when it’s only useful for the enterprise market?
- gjsman-1000 5y agoEconomy of scale. The ME isn't just a management tool but is also used to help initialize the CPU. No reason to write a whole custom way of doing that instead of reusing the same technology. Also, customer CPUs are often (due to binning) rebranded Enterprise CPUs that were rejected (or just not purchased) for whatever reason, or vice versa. Easier to build ME on them all and configure it later. Your ECC memory? It's something Intel just flips on or off depending on how they want to sell the chip - many Core i7s and i9s have it on-die but you can't use it. That's because it might be useful on a Xeon Platinum equivalent.